Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Jaiswal, Deepa
- Point Source-Driven Seasonal Hypoxia Signals Habitat Fragmentation and Ecosystem Change in River Ganga
Abstract Views :447 |
PDF Views:132
Authors
Affiliations
1 Ganga River Ecology Research Laboratory, Environmental Science Division, Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
2 Department of Botany, Mahatma Gandhi Kashividyapith University, Varanasi 221 002, IN
1 Ganga River Ecology Research Laboratory, Environmental Science Division, Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, IN
2 Department of Botany, Mahatma Gandhi Kashividyapith University, Varanasi 221 002, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 12 (2019), Pagination: 1947-1949Abstract
The development of dissolved oxygen deficit (DOD; hypoxia) has been reported to expand over 2.45 × 105 km2 area of the ocean from over 400 different areas worldwide1. Although cultural eutrophication has greatly accelerated DOD in estuaries and semi-enclosed seas2,3, it is not a common phenomenon in large rivers4. Hydrological continuum reinforces oxygenation, and therefore, development of hypoxia (dissolved oxygen (DO) < 2.0 mg l–1) is less critical in large rivers. River ecosystems usually respond to gradual changes in a smooth manner. However, smooth and continuous changes can be interrupted by sudden abrupt switches to a mosaic of alternative states leading to loss of resilience5. Such shifts are most often driven externally, for instance, point source flushing, but they can trigger internal feedbacks leading the system to behave chaostically even in the absence of external forcing6.References
- Diaz, R. J. and Rosenberg, R., Science, 2008, 321, 926–929.
- Chan, F. et al., Science, 2008, 319, 920.
- Conley, D. J., Carstensen, J., VaquerSunyer, R. and Duarte, C. M., Hydrobiologia, 2009, 629, 21–29.
- Diaz, R. J., J. Environ. Qual., 2001, 30, 275–281.
- Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C. and Walker, B., Nature, 2001, 413, 591–596.
- May, R. M., Nature, 1977, 269, 471–477.
- Pandey, J., Pandey, U. and Singh, A. V., Biogeochemistry, 2014, 119, 179–198.
- Tare, V., Yadav, A. V. S. and Bose, P., Water Res., 2003, 37, 67–77.
- APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington DC, USA, 1998.
- Sànchez, E. et al., Ecol. Indic., 2007, 7, 315–328.
- Hu, W. F., Lo, W., Chua, H., Sin, S. N. and Yu, P. H. F., Environ. Int., 2001, 26, 369–375.
- Tabatabai, M. A. and Bremner, J. M., Soil Biol. Biochem., 1969, 1, 301–307.
- Ling, T. Y., Ng, C. S., Lee, N. and Buda, D., World Appl. Sci. J., 2009, 7, 440– 447.
- Wang, W., Water Res., 1980, 14, 603– 612.
- Rong, N. and Shan, B., Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2016, 23, 13438–13447.
- Merseburger, G. C., Marti, E. and Sabater, F., Sci. Total Environ., 2005, 347, 217–229.
- Conley, D. J., Humborg, C., Rahm, L., Savchuk, O. P. and Wulff, F., Environ. Sci. Technol., 2002, 36, 5315–5320.
- Vahtera, E. et al., Ambio, 2007, 36, 186– 194.
- Grantham, B. A. et al., Nature, 2004, 429, 749–754.
- Hindustan, Varanasi Issue, 14 May 2018, p. 4.
- Jaiswal, D. and Pandey, J., Environ. Res., 2019, 178, 108712.
- ZSI, Faunal Resources of Ganga, Part I, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, 1991.
- Karthick, B., Mahesh, M. K. and Ramachandra, T. V., Curr. Sci., 2011, 100, 552–558.
- Pandey, U., Pandey, J., Singh, A. V. and Mishra, A., Curr. Sci., 2017, 113, 959– 964.